The Hilariously Confusing World of Insurance Vacancy Clauses

🤯 The Hilariously Confusing World of Insurance Vacancy Clauses

Ever read an insurance policy’s definition of “vacant” and feel like you needed a PhD in interpretive dance to understand it? Me too.

Vacancy clauses are a rollercoaster of legal nuance that make you question reality. Depending on the policy, “vacant” can mean completely opposite things.

Here’s how strange it can get:

🏠 Occupancy

Some policies act like the Strict Parent, demanding that someone must have lived in the property within the last 60 days of the loss.

Other policies take the Chill Aunt approach and say, “Eh, if someone—anyone—is in there, occupancy is occupancy.” 🤷‍♀️

Yes, even a squatter.

🔥 Maintenance

That same Chill Aunt policy might forgive full-time absence—but then turn around and require:

• Heat to be maintained
• Regular property checks
• Visits at least every 60 days

Miss one requirement and—surprise—the property is suddenly considered vacant.

🔨 Construction

This is where things get truly absurd.

In one policy, active construction means the property is not vacant because work is ongoing.

In another policy, the exact same presence of tools, workers, and materials is defined as making the property vacant. 🚧

‍

🛑 Why This Matters

If you’re building, remodeling, renovating, or even just enjoying a long vacation, your policy’s definition of vacancy could be the difference between a paid claim and a denied claim.

Vacancy clauses are not intuitive. They are not consistent. And they are often misunderstood—even by adjusters.

The Golden Rule

Before you even think about submitting a claim, call your trusted Public Adjuster (or at least give them a hug).

A public adjuster understands how vacancy language works and how to present a loss in a way that aligns with your policy’s specific—and often bizarre—definitions.

When vacancy is involved, wording isn’t a detail.
It’s everything.

‍